.
Feedback

Public Data Ferret Reviews the City's Options for the Old Woodinville Schoolhouse

Five options for the fate of of the city landmark are analyzed.

Editor’s note: The future of the Old Woodinville Schoolhouse has been in debate since the city relocated city hall to a new location in 2001. A building assessment report presented to the city council in early February revealed renovations to the vacant brick building could run as high as $3.5 million, and upwards of $5 million if 110 parking spaces are added. The city does not have the money to make the needed repairs and is considering whether the building could be rented or leased.

Matt Rosenberg did an analysis of the five options for the building based on the consultant’s report commissioned by the city, and wrote the summary below. Rosenberg is founder and executive director of Public Eye Northwest, and founder and editor of the news and knowledge base project Public Data Ferret. This analysis first appeared on Social Capital Review.

SUMMARY: A consultant team’s study for the City of Woodinville reports that the cost of redeveloping the city’s Old Woodinville Schoolhouse property, which dates to 1909 and served as city hall from 1993 to 2001, would range from $4 million to $5.5 million and that annual rents could reach $189,804. Calculations directly based on the study show that minus operating costs, best-case net annual income would equal $171,739 and return on investment would take 23 to 32 years – not including any interest paid on funds which might need to be borrowed to help pay for construction. Tenants could include a restaurant, wine-tasting room, retail stores and other uses. The difficult economy and slow commercial property market add risk to any redevelopment plan. Another option is demolishing the building, if King County landmark officials can be persuaded redevelopment doesn’t pencil out. Another strategy is to sell or lease the property as-is, to a private for-profit or non-profit entity which would then redevelop it and market it to tenants. Public meetings on the site’s future and the current study are coming in March and a decision by the City Council is expected this summer. 

BACKGROUND: The Old Woodinville Schoolhouse is a brick masonry building dating to 1909. It was expanded in 1936 and 1948 and served as City Hall from 1993 to 2001, when it suffered structural damage in the Nisqually Earthquake. It has been empty since then. Of the 18,435 square feet, 14,303 are leasable. A consultant study for the city by SHKS Architects – drawing in part on earlier expert analyses including a real estate market assessment of the property – was recently released. The new report details different redevelopment options. The city’s goals have been to preserve a property with historical resonance, upgrade it at low initial redevelopment costs and see that it is successfully marketed to tenants.

KEY LINKOld Woodinville Schoolhouse Feasibility/Renovation Study, Report to City Council, 1/27/11

KEY FINDINGS:

  • Four redevelopment options have been identified at total estimated costs ranging from $3.96 million to $5.55 million. Total costs include three sub-categories. They are 1) construction; 2) soft costs such as design, engineering, permits, sales taxes, testing and project management; and 3) parking lot expansion to add 110 more spaces, which are considered essential in order to maximize rent potential by attracting restaurant and retail tenants.
  • Several different types of tenants could occupy different parts of the building. Permitted uses include eating and drinking establishments; food, drug and liquor stores; a building, garden materials or hardware store; professional or government offices; a school, conference center, theater, library, or museum.
  • Against the $4 million to $5.5 million redevelopment costs, annual rent income potential is as high as $189,804 combined for the basement, first and second floors.
  • Calculations based on the consultant study show that minus annual operating costs of $18,435, best-case net yearly income from the property would be $171,739 and return on investment (ROI) would take anywhere from 23 years (Option A, $3.96 million) to 32 years (Option D – $5.55 million). Any interest paid on funds which might need to be borrowed to help pay for construction would add to the ROI timeframe.
  • The “demolish” option would cost $208,600 and include filling in the basement and paving over the property with more parking for the civic campus until a future development proposal emerges. The King County Landmarks Commission would have to approve, and the city would probably have to demonstrate renovation isn’t economically feasible.
  • The study notes that capital is tight, commercial property vacancy rates high and rents low in many locales including Woodinville, and that until unemployment or the threat of it decreases and consumer confidence grows, the market for commercial property will remain weak. One exception is warehouse-like spaces being rented to “small boutique wine production and distribution facilities, many with retail outlet/tasting rooms and plentiful parking.”
  • If the city decides to redevelop the property there are several different management and ownership scenarios. The city could manage the property in-house or hire a real estate management firm to get tenants and run the building. The city could sell or lease the property as-is to a private entity, either for-profit or non-profit, which could then renovate, manage and operate the facility – and which could take advantage of funding sources not available to public bodies.

City of Woodinville
Old Woodinville Schoolhouse Renovation Study
Council Report

Total Project Costs Comparison Chart Options Construction Costs Soft Costs @ 40% of Const. Cost Total Project Costs Annual Operating Costs @ $1/sf* Notes A: retrofit ex interior wood structure $2,422,775 $969,110 $3,391,885 $18,435   B: retrofit ex interior wood structure $2,709,716 $1,083,886 $3,793,602 $18,435   C: retrofit ex interior wood structure $3,004,701 $1,201,880 $4,206,581 $18,435   D: replace int structure w/new steel $3,561,316 $1,424,527 $4,985,843 $18,435 requires costlier TI E: demolish structure, fill and pave     $186,250   add 20+ spaces Parking expansion           P1: demo south half of CEC & pave     $435,125   add 80+ spaces P2: demo Public Works at SE & pave     $115,000   add 30 spaces P3: P1+P2     $568,125   add 110+ spaces

*Operating costs do not include leasing/management fees paid by landlord or direct utility charges and other typical NNN costs that are paid by tenants as part of lease rates.

from Old Woodinville Schoolhouse Feasibility/Renovation Study


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Woodinville Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Be inspired by this unique masterpiece, on May 26th in the Apple Farm Village.
Announcements  

0   Recommend Joel Cuellar

Be inspired by this unique masterpiece, on May 26th in the Apple Farm Village.
Saira V. May 19, 2013 at 10:11 pm
Paula, you'll have my vote! The preparation and thoughtful approach that you bring to our PlanningRead More Commission as its Chair will be a welcome skill set for serving on the Woodinville City Council. Good Luck!
Ken Mortland May 17, 2013 at 09:53 am
Congratulations to Inglemoor and Woodinville DECA teams. I knew you'd do us proud. NorthshoreRead More School District's DECA program has been winning awards for years. One of my ex-students, Heather Pressler, a DECA award winner from Inglemoor, is now a PhD candidate in molecular biology back on the East Coast. DECA opens so many doors to success.
L to R: Carol Pawlak, Amgen corportate communications; Bob Stewart, Bothell High School principal; Julia Lacey, Northshore School Board president; Larry Francois, Northshore superintendent; Amanda Rainwater, Bothell High School science teacher; and R
Ken Mortland May 17, 2013 at 09:48 am
Congratulation, Amanda. Always delights me to see Northshore teachers earning awards, as they areRead More among the very best in the state. Thank you for your efforts and service to your students and your profession.
Ken Mortland May 17, 2013 at 09:43 am
Congratulations, Lydia. You are continuing a tradition of leadership and excellent that is theRead More hallmark of the Northshore School District.
Margaret Santjer (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 07:07 am
Good luck and keep us posted!
Ken Mortland May 14, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Way to go, Knight's Science Team! What a thrill to compete nationally. We know you will do usRead More proud. Another example of the excellent educational services being delivered by Northshore School District and its teachers.
Ken Mortland May 10, 2013 at 01:31 pm
Once more we see solid evidence that Northshore's schools deliver excellent educational services.Read More How many school districts can boast that all three of their high schools are nationally ranked? Northshore's communities have good reason to be proud of their schools.
Heidi Lovett February 1, 2013 at 03:33 am
Teresa - It depends on how old your student is. You can contact our club at SwerveRobotics at gmailRead More dot com. I can help you get plugged in. Heidi - Lead Mentor, Swerve Robotics
Greg Fazzio January 31, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Theresa, you can contact Heidi Lovett at the address above to inquire about the program.
Carolyn Davids January 31, 2013 at 05:12 pm
ROBOT DEMOS! To schedule a robot demonstration for your school, business or club, contact HeidiRead More Lovett, Mentor, Swerve Robotics, email firstmentor@comcast.net, 206-679-4305.
Ken Mortland January 22, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Another great example of the quality of education available in the Northshore School Distict. Way toRead More go, Northshore.
Robert Michelson May 7, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Great opportunity to get together with neighbors and experience international culture in our ownRead More backyard! This will be terrific.
Local Guy April 10, 2013 at 01:58 pm
I have been extremely frustrated in the past in trying to effectively communicate with Frontier. MyRead More developing sense was one of very poor live support. I find it refreshing to see Frontier respond in a timely manner to this very public assertion. One can hope this is also occurring in your phone support, especially after hours...
Christy Reap April 10, 2013 at 12:30 pm
I have spoken to Mr. Gaulke and assured him we are not cutting speeds in the Woodinville market (orRead More any of our markets). We are working with him to approach his technical issues from scratch and will do all we can to alleviate his concerns about his speeds. His business, and all the business from our customers in the Woodinville market is very valuable to us. While we are disappointed to receive feedback his service is not living up to our standards, we are grateful for the opportunity to work with Mr. Gaulke and keep his valuable business. We welcome inquiries from other customers if there is anything we can do to improve. Please reach out to me at 425.275.8579 and let us know how we can help. Dan Clark General Manager Frontier Communications
Christy Reap April 5, 2013 at 09:47 pm
Frontier has spent the past three years expanding broadband to hundreds of thousands of homes acrossRead More the US and increasing speeds in many of our markets. Mr. Gaulke’s experience and recount of his conversation with one of our reps comes as a surprise to us. We are checking our records to find out what the possible miscommunication could have been. In the meantime, let us be clear: We are not decreasing speeds in Woodinvile, or any of our markets for that matter. We will be reaching out to Mr. Gaulke to see if we can alleviate any lingering concerns. Christy Reap Frontier Communications