.
Feedback

State Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Liquor Privatization Law

The Court also rejected a claim that the description of the new law on voters’ ballots was misleading.

 

The Washington State Supreme Court today rejected a lawsuit claiming that Initiative 1183, which privatized state liquor sales, violated the state Constitution’s requirement that proposed laws only address a single subject. The Court also rejected a claim that the description of the new law on voters’ ballots was misleading.

“We appreciate the Court recognized that this initiative satisfies our state Constitution's requirements and agrees that voters understood what they were voting for,” said Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna. “Our office argued, and the Court ruled, that all the provisions of were related to its single subject, liquor, and that the subject was appropriately disclosed in the ballot title.”

The initiative includes a requirement that a portion of new revenue coming from liquor license fees be used to increase funding for local public safety programs, including police and emergency services. Plaintiffs claimed “fees” should be called “taxes” on the November, 2011 ballot – and that such language might have changed the outcome of the vote. The State Supreme Court rejected this claim, communicating skepticism that anyone was deceived. In today’s decision, they wrote that “we will not void a law duly enacted by voters” based on the meaning of one word.

The Washington Association for Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention and a man who leased property to the Liquor Control Board for a store in Longview were among those who filed the challenge to I-1183. Eight local government officials filed a “friend of the court” brief in support of upholding the initiative. The unions representing store employees and the truckers who hauled liquor to the state stores filed an amicus brief opposing the law. The case was argued at the State Supreme Court by Senior Assistant Attorney General Mary Tennyson, who represents the State Liquor Control Board.  Assistant Attorney General Bruce Turcott was co-counsel on the brief.

Initiative 1183 passed with 52% of the vote last November. The state run liquor store in Woodinville closed last week. THe businessman who purchased the rights to sell liquor in Woodinville, , told Woodinville Patch he hopes to reopen the store by June 2.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Woodinville Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Mortland May 17, 2013 at 09:53 am
Congratulations to Inglemoor and Woodinville DECA teams. I knew you'd do us proud. NorthshoreRead More School District's DECA program has been winning awards for years. One of my ex-students, Heather Pressler, a DECA award winner from Inglemoor, is now a PhD candidate in molecular biology back on the East Coast. DECA opens so many doors to success.
L to R: Carol Pawlak, Amgen corportate communications; Bob Stewart, Bothell High School principal; Julia Lacey, Northshore School Board president; Larry Francois, Northshore superintendent; Amanda Rainwater, Bothell High School science teacher; and R
Ken Mortland May 17, 2013 at 09:48 am
Congratulation, Amanda. Always delights me to see Northshore teachers earning awards, as they areRead More among the very best in the state. Thank you for your efforts and service to your students and your profession.
Ken Mortland May 17, 2013 at 09:43 am
Congratulations, Lydia. You are continuing a tradition of leadership and excellent that is theRead More hallmark of the Northshore School District.
Local Guy April 10, 2013 at 01:58 pm
I have been extremely frustrated in the past in trying to effectively communicate with Frontier. MyRead More developing sense was one of very poor live support. I find it refreshing to see Frontier respond in a timely manner to this very public assertion. One can hope this is also occurring in your phone support, especially after hours...
Christy Reap April 10, 2013 at 12:30 pm
I have spoken to Mr. Gaulke and assured him we are not cutting speeds in the Woodinville market (orRead More any of our markets). We are working with him to approach his technical issues from scratch and will do all we can to alleviate his concerns about his speeds. His business, and all the business from our customers in the Woodinville market is very valuable to us. While we are disappointed to receive feedback his service is not living up to our standards, we are grateful for the opportunity to work with Mr. Gaulke and keep his valuable business. We welcome inquiries from other customers if there is anything we can do to improve. Please reach out to me at 425.275.8579 and let us know how we can help. Dan Clark General Manager Frontier Communications
Christy Reap April 5, 2013 at 09:47 pm
Frontier has spent the past three years expanding broadband to hundreds of thousands of homes acrossRead More the US and increasing speeds in many of our markets. Mr. Gaulke’s experience and recount of his conversation with one of our reps comes as a surprise to us. We are checking our records to find out what the possible miscommunication could have been. In the meantime, let us be clear: We are not decreasing speeds in Woodinvile, or any of our markets for that matter. We will be reaching out to Mr. Gaulke to see if we can alleviate any lingering concerns. Christy Reap Frontier Communications